<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/4.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ready, Aye, Ready</title>
		<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2" />
		<description>The AdamBlog</description>
		<language>en-CA</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=4.1.3"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Where'd the blogging go?</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/where-d-the-blogging-go?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:24:24 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Technology</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">1108@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;As any (by now) periodic reader has noticed, blogging&#039;s gone way down on my side of the Nimblebrain site. The reason is relatively simple. I was finding that most of the stuff I was commenting on was really &quot;Oh, this is interesting&quot; which required very little further analysis or discussion. Fun to share but not really in need of a full-blown article. I&#039;ve therefore moved pretty much all of what I have to say over to Twitter which with the abbreviated URLs and 140 character limit allows -- nay, requires -- me to be succinct and pithy. I&#039;ll still post longer items here but truly there&#039;s not been much recently that&#039;s motivated me to write them. Sure, I&#039;m no fan of proroguing Parliament but better writers than I have already tackled that one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, as part of my attempting to not leave trivially easy-to-follow trails on the internet, I&#039;m not referencing my Twitter username here; if you know who I am anyway, it&#039;ll be easy enough to find my Twitter feed. See you there!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/where-d-the-blogging-go?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As any (by now) periodic reader has noticed, blogging's gone way down on my side of the Nimblebrain site. The reason is relatively simple. I was finding that most of the stuff I was commenting on was really "Oh, this is interesting" which required very little further analysis or discussion. Fun to share but not really in need of a full-blown article. I've therefore moved pretty much all of what I have to say over to Twitter which with the abbreviated URLs and 140 character limit allows -- nay, requires -- me to be succinct and pithy. I'll still post longer items here but truly there's not been much recently that's motivated me to write them. Sure, I'm no fan of proroguing Parliament but better writers than I have already tackled that one.</p>
<p>Anyway, as part of my attempting to not leave trivially easy-to-follow trails on the internet, I'm not referencing my Twitter username here; if you know who I am anyway, it'll be easy enough to find my Twitter feed. See you there!</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/where-d-the-blogging-go?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/where-d-the-blogging-go?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1108</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>The Muppets Cover The Beatles</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/the-muppets-cover-the-beatles?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:25:54 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">YouTube</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">1099@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://saturdaymorningcentral.com/music/the-best-muppet-show-beatles-covers/&quot;&gt;http://saturdaymorningcentral.com/music/the-best-muppet-show-beatles-covers/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lovely collection of Beatles covers by the Muppets, including a superb &quot;Let It Be&quot; rework from Sesame Street.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2009/08/25/beatles-covers-from.html&quot;&gt;BoingBoing&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/the-muppets-cover-the-beatles?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://saturdaymorningcentral.com/music/the-best-muppet-show-beatles-covers/">http://saturdaymorningcentral.com/music/the-best-muppet-show-beatles-covers/</a></p><p>Lovely collection of Beatles covers by the Muppets, including a superb "Let It Be" rework from Sesame Street.</p>

<p>(Via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/08/25/beatles-covers-from.html">BoingBoing</a>)</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/the-muppets-cover-the-beatles?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/the-muppets-cover-the-beatles?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1099</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Producing address lists from the OSX Address book</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/producing-address-lists-from-the-osx-add?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Macintosh</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">1098@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I was mailed a bunch of contact information to another OSX user -- basically by emailing vCards from within the iPhone. I would have done it from the Mac but that required the extra step of saving the vCard to the filesystem before I could send it. Did you know that the iPhone *includes* the memo field in the contact information when it sends it? You do now so beware...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, eventually I got the following query back:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;How do I print an address book entry? Print just prints the street address in an envelope format with no other choice. So far the only way I could get a printout is to do a screen capture. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This resulted in a bit of headscratching, &#039;cause I couldn&#039;t figure it out either. After a bit of Googling, I found a few similar questions which were answered with &quot;Hey, just change the style from the print requestor&quot;. Excellent, except there&#039;s no style option actually on the print requestor.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, there is. In an uncharacteristic bit of crappy UI design, Apple hid the options needed wanted with a very non-obvious arrow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, here&#039;s the process of printing a group of addresses from the OSX addressbook app:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- Create a new group with all of the attendees in it (create group, drag each address into it)&lt;br /&gt;
- Select the group and choose print&lt;br /&gt;
- This brings up the print requestor. To the right of the printer selection is a little down arrow. Press it&lt;br /&gt;
- This brings up a much larger option screen. Under &quot;Style&quot; choose &quot;Mailing Labels&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
- This will produce a page of addresses. The bonus is that they&#039;re formatted appropriately for address labels if you have the right sticky label pages.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Under the &quot;style&quot; dropdown there&#039;s also the option to print out selected fields from the address book for a more traditional style address dump.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/producing-address-lists-from-the-osx-add?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I was mailed a bunch of contact information to another OSX user -- basically by emailing vCards from within the iPhone. I would have done it from the Mac but that required the extra step of saving the vCard to the filesystem before I could send it. Did you know that the iPhone *includes* the memo field in the contact information when it sends it? You do now so beware...</p>

<p>Anyway, eventually I got the following query back:</p>
<blockquote><p>How do I print an address book entry? Print just prints the street address in an envelope format with no other choice. So far the only way I could get a printout is to do a screen capture. </p></blockquote>

<p>This resulted in a bit of headscratching, 'cause I couldn't figure it out either. After a bit of Googling, I found a few similar questions which were answered with "Hey, just change the style from the print requestor". Excellent, except there's no style option actually on the print requestor.</p>

<p>Well, there is. In an uncharacteristic bit of crappy UI design, Apple hid the options needed wanted with a very non-obvious arrow.</p>

<p>So, here's the process of printing a group of addresses from the OSX addressbook app:</p>

<p>- Create a new group with all of the attendees in it (create group, drag each address into it)<br />
- Select the group and choose print<br />
- This brings up the print requestor. To the right of the printer selection is a little down arrow. Press it<br />
- This brings up a much larger option screen. Under "Style" choose "Mailing Labels"<br />
- This will produce a page of addresses. The bonus is that they're formatted appropriately for address labels if you have the right sticky label pages.</p>

<p>Under the "style" dropdown there's also the option to print out selected fields from the address book for a more traditional style address dump.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/producing-address-lists-from-the-osx-add?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/producing-address-lists-from-the-osx-add?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1098</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Facebook Faux Pas</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/facebook-faux-pas?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:27:53 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Technology</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">1097@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/eskimo/c850988b/note-to-self-don-t-friend-your-boss-on-fb-and-then&quot;&gt;http://friendfeed.com/eskimo/c850988b/note-to-self-don-t-friend-your-boss-on-fb-and-then&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As they say, &quot;Don&#039;t do this&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warrenkinsella.com/index.php?entry=entry090817-080007&quot;&gt;Warren Kinsella&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/facebook-faux-pas?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://friendfeed.com/eskimo/c850988b/note-to-self-don-t-friend-your-boss-on-fb-and-then">http://friendfeed.com/eskimo/c850988b/note-to-self-don-t-friend-your-boss-on-fb-and-then</a></p><p>As they say, "Don't do this".</p>

<p>(Via <a href="http://www.warrenkinsella.com/index.php?entry=entry090817-080007">Warren Kinsella</a>)</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/facebook-faux-pas?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/facebook-faux-pas?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1097</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>How Do You Identify Music Without A Title (Redux)</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/how-do-you-identify-music-without-a-titl?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">Music</category>
<category domain="main">iPhone</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">1094@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/2006/09/28/how_do_you_identify_music_without_a_titl?blog=5&quot;&gt;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/2006/09/28/how_do_you_identify_music_without_a_titl?blog=5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Back in 2006, I posed a question on the blog of how to identify music without knowing its name. Ritchie pointed me at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shazam.com/music/web/pages/iphone.html&quot;&gt;Shazam&lt;/a&gt; shortly after correctly identifying the specific track via its lyrics instead. Since that time, Shazam has been ported to the iPhone and I&#039;m pleased to report that it really does a sterling job. There remain a couple of recordings in my collection that even Shazam has problems with and, alas, they&#039;re mostly instrumental pieces so the old lyric fallback won&#039;t work there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, hey, this really is progress!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/how-do-you-identify-music-without-a-titl?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/2006/09/28/how_do_you_identify_music_without_a_titl?blog=5">http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/2006/09/28/how_do_you_identify_music_without_a_titl?blog=5</a></p><p>Back in 2006, I posed a question on the blog of how to identify music without knowing its name. Ritchie pointed me at <a href="http://www.shazam.com/music/web/pages/iphone.html">Shazam</a> shortly after correctly identifying the specific track via its lyrics instead. Since that time, Shazam has been ported to the iPhone and I'm pleased to report that it really does a sterling job. There remain a couple of recordings in my collection that even Shazam has problems with and, alas, they're mostly instrumental pieces so the old lyric fallback won't work there.</p>

<p>But, hey, this really is progress!</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/how-do-you-identify-music-without-a-titl?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/how-do-you-identify-music-without-a-titl?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1094</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Rebuilding the old tape collection</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/rebuilding_the_old_tape_collection?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:43:15 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Music</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">613@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;When I first started buying music I had a choice of cassette tape or vinyl. For reasons mostly involving the availability of singles, I tended to buy on vinyl. After a while I&#039;d accumulated a pretty good stock and found it was rather non-portable. A single record is relatively light; a bunch are both unwieldy and extremely heavy. Oh, and surprisingly fragile. As I was at school at the time and the proud possessor of a Walkman knockoff, I proceeded to copy most of it to cassette. Yes, I have a lot of white inner sleeves with a logo of large skull and crossbones over a cassette tape with text stating &quot;Home taping is killing music&quot;. Plus ca change.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over the years since, I&#039;ve accumulated a pretty good collection of music. Certainly far, far more than I did when I bought music on vinyl. With all of my CDs converted to MP3 I thought it might be fun to try to recreate my old tape collection with the newer higher quality versions. The gotcha is that I wanted to try to match the originals: the cuts had to be the appropriate single version where possible rather than just the album edit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t do it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The culprits are for the most part the old 12&quot; singles which I was quite partial to. Take for example New Order&#039;s &quot;Blue Monday &#039;88&quot;. I own the original 12&quot; version on vinyl but it&#039;s never been transferred over to CD. You can find the original 1983 12&quot; easily enough, and the 1988 7&quot; release turns up at least once on a compilation. The 1988 12&quot;? Not on your life. How about the Ben Liebrand &quot;Sunshine&quot; 12&quot; mix of Bill Withers&#039; &quot;Lovely Day?&quot; Yeah, you guessed it. Paul Hardcastle&#039;s &quot;19&quot; was released in two different versions depending on the market; the US version has a very different voice from the British one and sounds a lot weaker. Guess which version always shows up. Now try to find the a nice remaster of the UK 12&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, they&#039;re not the only ones. Trying to find the charting 7&quot; version of a lot of songs is pretty hard too. There are a number of compilations that do include obscure mixes but too often it&#039;s just the album version again. Unfortunately there&#039;s no way to find that out before it arrives, fully paid for, on your doorstep.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then there are the utterly wacky obscurities although still pressed by mainstream studios. Try finding &quot;The Young Ones&quot; cover of Traffic&#039;s &quot;Hole In My Shoe&quot; (bummer, man) or perhaps the Steve Harley vocal of &quot;Phantom Of the Opera&quot; (Michael Crawford sure spoiled that one.) Perhaps PhD&#039;s &quot;I Won&#039;t Let You Down&quot; (that would be the Scottish band, not the American one)? Even something as mainstream as Sly Fox&#039;s &quot;Let&#039;s Go All The Way&quot; was surprisingly difficult to find. On the other hand, I expected Guru Josh&#039;s &quot;Infinity 1990&quot; to be impossible to find and promptly discovered a CD single of it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the B sides? Oh. The flip side of the single with the theme tune to &quot;Dr Who&quot; during the Peter Davidson years is a great little synthesizer number called &quot;The Astronauts&quot;. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://paulcornell.blogspot.com/2006/01/quest-for-bbc-space-themes.html&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt; to get an idea of how hard that one is to find, even on vinyl. Hefti&#039;s &quot;Batusi A-Go Go (I Shouldn&#039;t Wish To Attract Attention)&quot;? Yeah.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fortunately I still -- even after all these years -- have the original vinyl. I&#039;ve converted it all onto CDs so at least it&#039;ll now remain accessible and not degrade further. All the same, the sound quality just isn&#039;t as good as a properly remastered release. The hunt continues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/rebuilding_the_old_tape_collection?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first started buying music I had a choice of cassette tape or vinyl. For reasons mostly involving the availability of singles, I tended to buy on vinyl. After a while I'd accumulated a pretty good stock and found it was rather non-portable. A single record is relatively light; a bunch are both unwieldy and extremely heavy. Oh, and surprisingly fragile. As I was at school at the time and the proud possessor of a Walkman knockoff, I proceeded to copy most of it to cassette. Yes, I have a lot of white inner sleeves with a logo of large skull and crossbones over a cassette tape with text stating "Home taping is killing music". Plus ca change.</p>

<p>Over the years since, I've accumulated a pretty good collection of music. Certainly far, far more than I did when I bought music on vinyl. With all of my CDs converted to MP3 I thought it might be fun to try to recreate my old tape collection with the newer higher quality versions. The gotcha is that I wanted to try to match the originals: the cuts had to be the appropriate single version where possible rather than just the album edit.</p>

<p>I can't do it. </p>

<p>The culprits are for the most part the old 12" singles which I was quite partial to. Take for example New Order's "Blue Monday '88". I own the original 12" version on vinyl but it's never been transferred over to CD. You can find the original 1983 12" easily enough, and the 1988 7" release turns up at least once on a compilation. The 1988 12"? Not on your life. How about the Ben Liebrand "Sunshine" 12" mix of Bill Withers' "Lovely Day?" Yeah, you guessed it. Paul Hardcastle's "19" was released in two different versions depending on the market; the US version has a very different voice from the British one and sounds a lot weaker. Guess which version always shows up. Now try to find the a nice remaster of the UK 12".</p>

<p>However, they're not the only ones. Trying to find the charting 7" version of a lot of songs is pretty hard too. There are a number of compilations that do include obscure mixes but too often it's just the album version again. Unfortunately there's no way to find that out before it arrives, fully paid for, on your doorstep.</p>

<p>Then there are the utterly wacky obscurities although still pressed by mainstream studios. Try finding "The Young Ones" cover of Traffic's "Hole In My Shoe" (bummer, man) or perhaps the Steve Harley vocal of "Phantom Of the Opera" (Michael Crawford sure spoiled that one.) Perhaps PhD's "I Won't Let You Down" (that would be the Scottish band, not the American one)? Even something as mainstream as Sly Fox's "Let's Go All The Way" was surprisingly difficult to find. On the other hand, I expected Guru Josh's "Infinity 1990" to be impossible to find and promptly discovered a CD single of it.</p>

<p>And the B sides? Oh. The flip side of the single with the theme tune to "Dr Who" during the Peter Davidson years is a great little synthesizer number called "The Astronauts". See <a href="http://paulcornell.blogspot.com/2006/01/quest-for-bbc-space-themes.html">this link</a> to get an idea of how hard that one is to find, even on vinyl. Hefti's "Batusi A-Go Go (I Shouldn't Wish To Attract Attention)"? Yeah.</p>

<p>Fortunately I still -- even after all these years -- have the original vinyl. I've converted it all onto CDs so at least it'll now remain accessible and not degrade further. All the same, the sound quality just isn't as good as a properly remastered release. The hunt continues.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/rebuilding_the_old_tape_collection?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/rebuilding_the_old_tape_collection?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=613</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>iPhone notepad</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/iphone-notepad?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:42:44 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">iPhone</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">1093@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/2009/07/simplenote&quot;&gt;http://daringfireball.net/2009/07/simplenote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Daring Fireball has an interesting take on why the iPhone&#039;s note application is the pinnacle of the breed, with one of two minor niggles.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I still can&#039;t agree: the time-based flat access system that John Gruber considers to be the appropriate design drives me nuts. Perhaps it&#039;s because I used the Palm notes for so long but I absolutely have to have a category to allow me to distinguish between notes for different purposes. Without that, and even with just a few notes, the whole lot becomes an unmanageable mess. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, the addition of syncing with OSX&#039;s Mail.app and the iPhone&#039;s new &quot;Find&quot; tool does go a long way to making it valuable again. And he&#039;s absolutely right on the poor font choice and the lack of internet/MobileMe syncing. It&#039;s horrible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/iphone-notepad?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/07/simplenote">http://daringfireball.net/2009/07/simplenote</a></p><p>Daring Fireball has an interesting take on why the iPhone's note application is the pinnacle of the breed, with one of two minor niggles.</p>

<p>I still can't agree: the time-based flat access system that John Gruber considers to be the appropriate design drives me nuts. Perhaps it's because I used the Palm notes for so long but I absolutely have to have a category to allow me to distinguish between notes for different purposes. Without that, and even with just a few notes, the whole lot becomes an unmanageable mess. </p>

<p>That said, the addition of syncing with OSX's Mail.app and the iPhone's new "Find" tool does go a long way to making it valuable again. And he's absolutely right on the poor font choice and the lack of internet/MobileMe syncing. It's horrible.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/iphone-notepad?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/iphone-notepad?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1093</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Cool baby furniture</title>
			<link>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/cool-baby-furniture?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Silly</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">1090@http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://i.gizmodo.com/5276024/blade+covered-baby-equipment-perfect-shower-gifts-for-the-antichrist&quot;&gt;http://i.gizmodo.com/5276024/blade+covered-baby-equipment-perfect-shower-gifts-for-the-antichrist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not really a baby person, but this cr&amp;#232;che furniture is quite appealing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/cool-baby-furniture?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5276024/blade+covered-baby-equipment-perfect-shower-gifts-for-the-antichrist">http://i.gizmodo.com/5276024/blade+covered-baby-equipment-perfect-shower-gifts-for-the-antichrist</a></p><p>I'm not really a baby person, but this cr&#232;che furniture is quite appealing.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/cool-baby-furniture?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php/cool-baby-furniture?blog=5#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.nimblebrain.net/index.php?blog=5&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1090</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>

